Inspirata Designs Tarot Readings About Us Tour Guiding in Ireland Links DVDs Back to Homepage The Arts Workshops and Tour Schedule Book of Shadows Archive

Current Views and Topics

The following are our views on various issues. We have published them here for a couple of reasons. First, because they are the most common questions that we are asked in regard to how we practise; and secondly, to prevent us being misrepresented by the incorrect statements that are sometimes circulated regarding what we have supposed to have said or done (all Wiccan authors have to face the 'rumour mill').

They do not necessarily represent the views of others within Witchcraft; we respect their right to different views as long as these views remain consistant with the Wicca Rede: 'An it harm none, do what thou wilt', and they respect our right to differ as well. Some may note that these views are different to those expressed in our older books - remember these were published over 20 years ago! All things change, and that includes ourselves. We consider ourselves to still be in a process of growth and learning.


What is Witchcraft and what is a Witch?
For us, Witchcraft has its origins in the Pre-Christian Priesthoods of Europe. It is, to all intents and purposes, the survivals of Western/Northern European Shamanistic practise. The major tenet of Witchcraft has always been 'If it works, use it!'. As such it encompasses an earth-based spirituality, while intrinsically being a tradition of service to the godas and the community the Witch lives. A Witch is, and always shall be, a healer for these reasons.
Back to Top

Modern Origins of Wicca:
Over 30 years, we have seen no evidence to suggest modern Wicca practise goes back beyond the 1950s. In fact, we have plenty of evidence to the opposite. We do not feel that this invalidates modern Witchcraft, quite the reverse: although the practise is young, the underlying philosophies are ancient and still valid, even in todays modern society. For us, witchcraft is a dynamic, evolving tradition which has survived for this reason. We believe that the likes of Gardner, Sanders, etc. did what was right for their period of history. We feel it is important that we should do what is right for ours! They did make mistakes, but don't we all - it is all part of the learning process.
Back to Top

God, Goddess and Polytheism:
We consider ourselves to be polytheists not duotheists. This has come about because of our experiences with working with deity over the years. We see spirit as immanent and therefore in ourselves as well as in nature. We work with many God and Goddess forms; some from nature, some ancestral forms. we regard these as real spirit forms and personalities, even though we understand the psychology behind them. Because of this, we cannot, by any other definition, be anything else but polytheistic.
Back to Top

Initiation:
For us, initiation comes from Spirit - God and Goddess, or whatever face you put on it. In old Gardnerian Laws this was stated as 'There is only one true initiator', meaning deity working through the self. We therefore see initiation as being 'a passage right of entry' into the coven or at a later stage as a 'passage right of acceptance, epiphany or realisation', that a truly spiritual initiation has taken place.
Back to Top

Self-Initiation:
We do not believe there truly is such a thing as 'self-initiation', as we believe initiation comes from spirit (see above). Therefore, if you perform an initiation by yourself and deity comes through, how can it be self-initiation' when it is deity that initiates you?! Saying this, we do not believe you can self-initiate into traditions such as Gardnerian or Alexandrian as they require lineage (apostolic succession). You must abide by the rules of those traditions.
Back to Top

Sexual Initiation:
We have no moral problems with covens using sexual initation. We believe it is important that anyone approaching a coven who uses this form should be informed right from the beginning about its use. They must be given the choice: if they don't like it they can always walk away and find another coven/initiator. For an initiate or pre-initiate to suddenly be told just prior to initiation that it will be sexual, we consider unacceptable, immoral and manipulative. Sexual initiation must be safe, sane and consentual. Our personal view is that sexual initiation should only take place between partners already in an existing, stable, loving relationship and this should be done privately. We, personally, do not use sexual initiation, except in those circumstances. We feel it is open to misuse and abuse.
Back to Top

Traditions:
Our research has suggested that the idea of traditions within Wicca came about due to an argument. Regardless, they are here to stay and must therefore serve a purpose. We have seen traditions evolve over the years. The old styles are dying out, and being replaced by 'Coven Based Traditions' as we call them, that are honest about their origins and do not feel the need to have 'originated with granny'! These are self-contained systems which encourage experimentation and growth. We believe evolution, just as it is a major factor in nature, must be a factor in a nature-based religion.
Back to Top

What Tradition Do We Follow:
We do not folow any specific tradition although our origins are in Alexandrian and Seax-Wica. We are progressive in our outlook, and could easily describe our method as 'Deity Based Wicca', or 'Progressive Witchcraft' - these are descriptive terms rather than named traditions. We use what works, applying magical systems and ritual as tools for connection with deity. At present this includes Shamanism and Trance-Prophesy work.
Back to Top

Lineage and Hereditary Witchcraft:
Lineage has its origins in Wicca out of Comasonry (Fellowship of Crotona). It is apostolic succession with its origins in Christianity, not Paganism. We do not believe it is a good judge of someone's ability as a Witch; we feel training is much more important. In the past it has been misued as a way of acceptance without doing the work! To date, the only hereditary witches we have met have been Italian Strega. We believe there are few true survivals.
Back to Top

Degree System:
This has its origins in the same place as Lineage. We attempted to amend the degree system some time ago. This is because we had origins in two traditions. We wanted to make something more organic and natural to replace it. What we found was that witches liked the degree system too much! There is good reason for this, a psychological process outlined by Maslow - his Hierarchy of Needs. Basically, people need goals. We now have a four level system starting with a Dedication level going up to third. It is not hierarchical, but based on achievement.
Back to Top

The Rede:
We do actually follow the Wiccan Rede ('An it harm none, do what thou will'), although we are also aware of its philosophical and ethical limitations, mainly around what constitutes 'ham' and who 'none' actually applies to. These can both be subjectively interpreted. Most religions have tomes of books related to ethics and laws; it is in fact quite arrogant of us to think we can sum everything up in this one law. It this was not true, Gardner/Valiente would have not created the Wiccan Laws that they did. Likewise, our Celtic and Norse ancestors both had systems of ethics and laws that were more than just one statement (the Brehon Laws and the Havamal respectively). An ethical philosopher would call the Rede 'a utilitarian ethic', e.g. an ethic which is useful in specific situations. we feel it should not be accepted dogmatically, but philosophised over by the individual witch to see how it applies to them in everyday life.
Back to Top

What We Call Ourselves:
We use the terms 'Priest' and 'Priestess' to describe ourselfs (principally of the Goddess Freya). As far as we are concerned, these are job descriptions not hierarchical titles. Janet no longer uses the term 'High Priestess' to describe herself, preferring the term 'Priestess' or just plain 'witch', and Gavin does similar. This is a personal decision and we respect others rights to use such a title when appropriate. we have no time for self-proclaimed media-hunting "'Kings' or 'Queens' of Witches". We are most definitely 'Wiccan Republicans'.
Back to Top

The Mysteries:
We believe the spiritual mysteries are intrinsic part of Witchcraft. This is unavoidable as 'the first thing magic changes is the self'. It is therefore impossible to be a witch without having to go through periods of self-development and personal growth. We work the three mysteries related to the degree system.
Back to Top

Training and the Coven:
We consider training the most important factor in Witchcraft. More important, even, than lineage, degree system or initiation. We do not believe that the learning process ever stops, even after death. Therefore, there is no such thing as someone who knows 'everything' about Witchcraft - we would certainly not say that about ourselves. Perople are just farther down the Path. For us, the Coven is there to provide a forum for training and brother/sisterhood.
Back to Top

Black and White Magic:
We don't use either! For us, there is no such thing. The use of 'Black' and 'White' are very much dualist terms of Christian origin. If you wanted a colour for what sort of magic we use, we'd say 'Purple' and 'Green'! We agree very much with Isaac Bonewits on this issue in his book Real Magic.
Back to Top

Alternative Sexuality and the Craft:
Most of the pagan community are aware that prior to Stewart Farrar's death, we were in a polyfidelitous relationship - Janet had two husbands and none of us went outside that relationship. This was a mutual agreement between all of us. Since his death, we have decided to remain in a monogamous relationship in the normal Judeo-Christian pattern. We are not exponents of polyamory, neither are we against it. We have many friends in successly poly 'families'. Our view is: 'all acts of love and pleasure are mine' sayeth the Goddess, and this applies to all safe, sane and consentual forms of sexuality. For us, sexuality is a personal, spiritual thing, as with most witches, and should be treated with maturity. We consider sexual manipulation, rape, paedophilia and other sexual crimes to be an anathema to the Goddess.
Back to Top

Homosexuality and the Craft:
This has already been covered above, but probably needs to be reiterated. We have been initiating gay people into Wicca since the early 1980s, and have even performed same sex handfastings. We see no reason why they should not be initiated as Witches - for us, sexual polarity, or sexual preference for that matter, is not an issue. In our experience we have found that more gays entereing the Craft have already dealt with issues related to anima/animus which would not normally be dealt with by heterosexuals until Second Degree.
Back to Top

Prejudice:
We hold no truck with prejudice of any form, be it homophobic, racist, sexist, etc. We do not believe that such prejudices should be tolerated within Wicca, and feel they go against the principles of the Wiccan Rede.
Back to Top

Conflict with other Religions:
There is no reason why a Witch should 'hate' true Christianity or any other true spiritual path, for that matter. The enemy is fundamentalism and this even exists within Paganism. A Witch should be comfortable in any place of worship and should see the similarities, rather than the differences, between religions.
Back to Top

Were we (Janet and Stewart Farrar) Oath breakers?:
Quite simply, we were not. This came about because we published material in The Witches' Bible/Eight Sabbats/Witches' Way related to the Gardnerian Book of Shadows. We did this with written permission of the copyright holder and co-author - Doreen Valiente. These documents remain in our archive. At the time (early 1980s), Alexandrians were not accepted as craft by the Gardnerians and therefore we could not be bound by a Garnderian Oath which we had not taken.
Back to Top

Conflict Situations (Witch Wars):
Our views on Witch Wars can be found at The Witches' Voice. It's not our policy to get involved in disputes and conflict situations. We rarely know both sides of the story. Neither are we particularly interested in them. We prefer to remain neutral in situations where we are not directly involved. We make sure that both parties know this when this occurs, and have a policy of 'transparency' - cc'd mailing to both parties. You cannot change the views of your enemies, only your friends. We therefore do not enter into personal conflicts with people.
Back to Top

Rumours:
It is inevitable rumours will go around about us - it's unavoidable as we are publicly known. We have had many amusing ones over the years, and not so amusing ones! It is our policy to bring rumours 'out into the light'. In our experience, they are like a virus which relies on damp, dark places to survive and die when exposed to the light of truth. We attack the rumour, not the rumour-monger. In our expierence, most rumours are self-defeating and tell you more about the purveyor of the rumour than the person they're aimed at. Our exception is when slander occurs accusing us of illegal acts; we respond with legal action as anyone would.
Back to Top

We are not Perfect!:
We prefer people to see us as human beings not 'icons'. We feel to be regarded as such is dangerous; not just ot others, but also to our own egos! There is no longer any place for the 'cult of personality' (Sanders, Garnder, etc) within Wicca, and we feel such days are over (with good riddance!). We are human beings who eat, shit and screw up like eeryone else! We do not tolerate being pedestalled for this reason. We have the policy of politely, but humorously, 'jumping off the pedestal and running away!' when it occurs.
Back to Top